UTA Ecosystem Discussions

our submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the
submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly
quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. The similarity report
that is provided when you submit your task can be used as a guide.
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides
detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be
evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to
relevant portions of the course.
Tasks may not be submitted as cloud links, such as links to Google Docs, Google Slides,
OneDrive, etc., unless specified in the task requirements. All other submissions must be file
types that are uploaded and submitted as attachments (e.g., .docx, .pdf, .ppt).
A. Discuss how Medicare certification affects healthcare delivery based on the
Conditions of Participation.
1. Explain the difference between accreditation and licensing for healthcare
organizations.
B. Explain the relationship between a quality reporting system and reimbursement for
healthcare services (e.g., Merit-Based Incentive Payment System and value-based
care).
1. Discuss how patient Medicare eligibility requirements influence the types of
healthcare services available to patients.
C. Discuss one example of federal legislation that affects the provision of healthcare
services.
D. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for
content that is quoted, paraphrased or summarized.
E. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your
submission.
Task 2
Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission
and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely
paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. The similarity report that is provided when you submit
your task can be used as a guide.
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria
that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one
rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.
Tasks may not be submitted as cloud links, such as links to Google Docs, Google Slides, OneDrive, etc.,
unless specified in the task requirements. All other submissions must be file types that are uploaded and
submitted as attachments (e.g., .docx, .pdf, .ppt).
A. Analyze key historic events and the implications of economic, social, and legislative impacts by doing
the following:
1. Discuss how historic events influenced the evolution of medicine.
2. Discuss how historic events influenced the roles of healthcare professionals.
3. Discuss how historic events influenced technology in healthcare.
B. Describe the components of a healthcare delivery system.
1. Explain how operations of a healthcare delivery system influence patient care access.
2. Explain how operations of a healthcare delivery system influence patient care cost.
3. Explain how operations of a healthcare delivery system influence quality of patient care.
C. Analyze trends in healthcare and emerging technological developments by doing the following:
1. Discuss one federal government initiative related to health informatics.
2. Discuss how emerging technology affects the practice of medicine.
D. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is
quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
E. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
WFM1 — WFM1 TASK 2: TRENDS IN THE ECOSYSTEM
HEALTHCARE ECOSYSTEMS — C799
PRFA — WFM1
TASK OVERVIEW
SUBMISSIONS
EVALUATION REPORT
EVALUATION REPORT — ATTEMPT 1 — REVISION NEEDED
Overall Evaluator Comments
EVALUATOR COMMENTS
You did a great job discussing the how quality improvement activities influence lower healthcare costs.
Additionally, you provided a well-developed discussion on the quality of patient care by noting that healthcare
operations that include clear and transparent communication and collaboration among providers allows better
quality care. Please read the comments in the rubric below for details about aspects that require revisions.
Evaluator Attached Files
APA 7th ed. Student Helpfulness Guide V2.pdf
A1. Evolution of Medicine
Approaching Competence The discussion does not logically address how historic events influenced the
evolution of medicine.
EVALUATOR COMMENTS: ATTEMPT 1
The submission mentions several resources used during ancient times for medicinal purposes. However, the
response does not discuss a specific historic event that influenced the use of these resources. For Instruction on
“Evolution of Medicine”, please connect with your Instructor and revisit the course of study.
A2. Roles of Healthcare Professionals
Competent The discussion logically addresses how historic events influenced the roles of healthcare
professionals.
There are no comments for this aspect.
A3. Technology in Healthcare
Competent The discussion logically addresses how historic events influenced technology in healthcare.
There are no comments for this aspect.
B. Components of a Healthcare Delivery System
Not Evident A description is not provided.
EVALUATOR COMMENTS: ATTEMPT 1
The submission provides a description of various influences to patient access such a better administration and
distribution of resources. However, a description addressing the components of a healthcare delivery system is
missing. For Instruction on “Components of a Healthcare Delivery System”, please connect with your Instructor and
revisit the course of study.
B1. Patient Care Access
Competent The explanation logically addresses how operations of a healthcare delivery system influence patient
care access.
There are no comments for this aspect.
B2. Patient Care Cost
Competent The explanation logically addresses how operations of a healthcare delivery system influence patient
care cost.
There are no comments for this aspect.
B3. Quality of Patient Care
Competent The explanation logically addresses how operations of a healthcare delivery system influence quality
of patient care.
There are no comments for this aspect.
C1. Federal Government Initiative
Competent The discussion logically addresses 1 federal government initiative related to health informatics.
There are no comments for this aspect.
C2. Emerging Technology
Approaching Competence The discussion does not logically address how emerging technology affects the
practice of medicine.
EVALUATOR COMMENTS: ATTEMPT 1
The submission discusses how technology has helped improve medications. The response is incomplete because a
discussion addressing a specific type of emerging technology is missing. For Instruction on “Emerging Technology”,
please connect with your Instructor and revisit the course of study.
D. APA Sources
Approaching Competence The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted,
paraphrased, or summarized but does not demonstrate a consistent application of APA style.
EVALUATOR COMMENTS: ATTEMPT 1
The submission provides a reference list and in-text citations. The references are not in the correct APA format.
Please see the attached student APA helpfulness guide for assistance.
E. Professional Communication
Competent Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the
task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended
meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding.
There are no comments for this aspect.